Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube

Precision Time Transfer

JILA plays an important role in the nation’s timekeeping by coordinating precision time transfer of atomic-clock time as determined by the NIST Time Scale. Located in Boulder, Colorado, the Time Scale uses nine atomic clocks and a complex measurement system to determine the exact time. It is calibrated by a cesium fountain atomic clock, which neither gains nor loses one second in 80 million years. The transmission of the exact time from the NIST Time Scale is managed by Judah Levine in the Time Service Control Center in JILA. Custom software computes the average times of the clocks in the Time Scale. This average time is coordinated with the times of other national laboratories to create a global Time Scale, which is used as the reference for worldwide timekeeping. National and international time coordination facilitates digital communication, power transmission, financial transactions, telecommunications, satellite communications, and scientific collaborations across national boundaries. To ensure that the nation always has access to atomic clock time, NIST maintains a back-up Time Scale, located near Fort Collins, Colorado. JILA researchers also perform time transfer research to support the continued availability of the highest quality precision time transfer.

Atomic Clock Time for Everyone

Judah Levine wants everyone to have access to the correct time, as determined by atomic clocks at NIST and other national laboratories around the world. Since 1967, the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) has been responsible for determining Coordinated Universal Time, or UTC. The BIPM is located near Paris and has no clocks of its own. It determines UTC by averaging the data from 400 atomic clocks, which are located at NIST and other timing laboratories throughout the world. The BIPM computes this average using measurements made every 5 days at 0 UTC and publishes the difference between the UTC Time Scale maintained by each laboratory and this overall average. Because data from BIPM arrives at NIST about a month after the fact, Levine is responsible for NIST's predictions of UTC, or UTC (NIST). NIST scientists use UTC (NIST) as a real-time estimate of both UTC and International Atomic Time (TAI).

Levine oversees multiple approaches for communicating UTC (NIST) to anyone who wants to know the exact time or evaluate the frequency of a device. First, he and his colleagues devise methods for distributing frequency information with the highest possible accuracy. These methods are used to compare widely separated primary reference clocks, for example, which have accuracies and fractional frequency stabilities approaching 10-15. Comparing devices that can realize this level of accuracy or stability requires that the error budget of the measurement process itself be significantly smaller than this value. Two techniques are used: (1) two-way satellite time/frequency transfer that uses commercial broadcast satellites to exchange data between two sites with atomic clocks and (2) GPS carrier-phase time or frequency transfer using measurements of the phase of radio-frequency carrier waves transmitted by Global Positioning satellites. By comparing GPS measurements at two atomic clock sites, Levine's group can evaluate the clocks' frequencies.

The GPS technique is much more cost effective than the two-way satellite technique because users don't have to pay to use the system. However, discontinuities often appear between the end of one data set and the beginning of the next. Levine's group recently developed an improved analytical approach that may be useful for dealing with these discontinuities.

Because the two methods are affected by very different noise sources, using them simultaneously provides insight into the limitations of both. For example, the Levine group has compared the frequency of the cesium fountain atomic clock at NIST with a similar device operating at the Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in Braunschweig, Germany. Using an averaging time of 42 days, the combined uncertainty of the two techniques is about 4.2 x 10-16, which is about a factor of 5 smaller than the accuracy of the devices themselves. These results show that the techniques are adequate for comparing the frequencies of the current generation of primary frequency standards, but they are unlikely to remain adequate as higher-accuracy clocks are developed in the near future.

The Levine group also designs and operates the public Network Time Service, which currently handles about 75,000 requests per second for time in a variety of digital formats. To satisfy both the current number of requests and anticipated service growth, Levine and his colleagues are working on new techniques to improve the cost/benefit ratio of their client systems. That is, they are figuring out ways to improve the accuracy of the time of the client systems, while at the same time requiring fewer requests to the servers. They are also developing software that can support an explicit trade-off between the accuracy of the time of the client system and the number of calibrations that is required to realize this accuracy. For example, users who require only modest time accuracy (e.g., ~0.1 s) can configure their software so that the cost of realizing this accuracy can be almost a thousand times less than the cost of realizing the highest possible accuracy of about 10–30 ms. (In both cases, the cost is a function of the network bandwidth and number of computer cycles used.) This is a significant advance, since many users require only relatively modest time accuracies and cannot effectively make use of the higher accuracy that can be realized with more frequent calibrations. Possibly as a result of new techniques such as this one, the growth in the use of the time service to communicate UTC (NIST) has slowed from about 7% per month to about 1% per month.

Once UTC (NIST) is known, it is transmitted to radio station operators in Fort Collins, Colorado, and Hawaii that, in turn, broadcast the information to the public via shortwave radio station WWV and WWVA. However, a second station, WWVB, which is also located at Fort Collins, Colorado, transmits a low frequency signal at 60 kHz. Many wall clocks, wristwatches, and other consumer devices can receive these signals. UTC (NIST) is also available via a talking clock at 303-499-7111 and in digital format at 303-494-4774. It is also available over the Internet. At present, 47 Internet servers, all synchronized to the NIST atomic clock ensemble, answer about 10 billion requests a day for the exact time. All of the NIST time services are provided at no extra charge beyond the cost of the network connection or telephone call.

Back-Up Time Scale

The nation’s backup Time Scale consists of five atomic clocks, two measurement systems, and supporting hardware. It is tucked away inside the remote transmission station for NIST’s WWV radio station, located 12 miles northwest of Fort Collins, Colorado.

The remote Time Scale controls WWV’s 2.5–20 MHz transmissions, NIST’s talking clock (303-499-7111), and other time services. WWV transmits its signals via five antennas mounted on towers ranging from 7.5 to 60 m tall. The backup Time Scale also controls transmissions from NIST radio station WWVB, located just down the road from WWV. WWVB transmits 60 kHz signals that are used by wall clocks, wristwatches, and many automated systems. The time display on the first floor of the JILA tower is synchronized using these signals.