Selection Rules

Despite the complex dynamics of few-body systems interacting with intense laser fields, the final state energy and momentum distributions of the particles often show some general features due to Coulomb repulsion or symmetries of accessible final states. We have analyzed so-called selection rules for the emission of two electrons from helium following the absorption of a few photons in a laser field. The increase of the number of absorbed photons leads to alternating suppression and non-suppression of the back-to-back emission of the two electrons. The Figure shows a snapshot of the two-electron dynamics following single-photon (inner part of distribution) and two-photon double ionization (outer part). The cover page of Journal of Physics B featured the results for the three- and four-photon processes.

Reference:

H. Ni et al., J. Phys. B 44, 175601 (2011)

Collaboration:

C. Ruiz (Universidad Salamanca, Spain)

Featured by J. Phys. B in their LabTalk.

Stark Shifted

The phenomenon of energy shifts of atomic levels in a static electric field is well-known and referred to as Stark shift. We have shown that attosecond pulse technology should enable us to observe these shifts instantaneously in an oscillating intense laser field. In our proposed technique the energy gaps between ground and (Stark shifted) excited states of an atom in an infrared field are probed with an exciting single attosecond pulse. The population in the excited states, generated by the attosecond pulse, is then ionized by the remaining infrared pulse. Hence, as a function of time delay between the pulses the ionization probability reflects the instantaneous energy gaps (see Figure). Detailed knowledge of the energy states in the field may have impact on controlling more complex processes, such as correlated electron emission from the atom.

Reference:

F. He et al., J. Phys. B 44, 211001 (2011)

Collaboration:

F. He (Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China)
C. Ruiz (Universidad Salamanca, Spain)
U. Thumm (Kansas State University)

Time-Resolving the Dynamics

The population and decay of excited states during laser-driven double ionization is an example for ultrafast correlated electron dynamics in an atom or molecule. In this so-called RESI process an initially field ionized electron is driven back to the parent ion by the intense field and shares its energy with a second electron to excite the ion. The time span to observe the excitation is less than a femtosecond, since the weakly bound electron in the excited state is likely to be ionized by the field. Attosecond laser pulse technology should provide the appropriate tool to observe the instantaneous state of the ion. Our numerical results show that one can indeed probe the electron in the excited states via ionization by an attosecond VUV pulse. However, the attosecond pulse does also initiate additional electron dynamics in the atom, which makes the trace of the RESI process difficult to separate from other signals. The Figure shows a snapshot of the complex dynamics.

Reference:

S. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. A 82, 033426 (2010)

Collaboration:

C. Ruiz (Universidad Salamanca, Spain)

JILA research highlight: Ionize Me!.

Beyond 1D

Computation of the quantum two-electron problem in an intense laser pulse constitutes a major challenge, since it involves six dimensions in space and one in time. Model systems in reduced dimensions are therefore often used. A simple principle, based on Newton's law that any directionality in the external force will be transfered to the center-of-mass motion of a many-electron system, helps to reduce the computational costs of the laser driven two-electron problem (He and H2). The cover page of PRL featured a time slice of our numerical simulations for the spatial probability for two helium electrons in a laser pulse. Points on the "X" lead to single ionization, while those off the "X" result in double ionization. The model has been used to reveal new pathways to laser-driven double ionization and their relation to field-free correlated electron dynamics.

References:

C. Ruiz et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 053001 (2006)
A. Staudte et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 263002 (2007)
S. Baier et al., Phys. Rev. A 78, 013409 (2008)

Collaborations:

L. Plaja and L. Roso (Universidad Salamanca, Spain)
P. Corkum (NRC Ottawa, Canada)
R. Dörner (Universität Frankfurt, Germany)